Whether
you are young or old, Republican or Democrat, or black or white, almost
everyone has an opinion on gun control.
Should it be legal to carry guns? Should it not be legal? This is a growing problem here in the U.S.
and it’s time we face this problem head on.
Unfortunately, the prevention of gun control most likely would not lower
the death rate. It also would not stop
killers from getting guns. If it is
truly what they desire, criminals will find a way to obtain a gun no matter
what. The real issue here is that
citizens need to be able to protect themselves from shooters.
Within just the past few months
there have been mass shootings that have devastated our country. One example of this was the Colorado movie
theater shooting. A total of 12 people
died and 59 were injured. Would this
number have been different if civilians were allowed to carry guns? Another example of a tragic shooting was the
Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
Here, a total of 26 people died; 20 were students while 6 were
adults. We all know that it must take
someone crazy and insane to do such a thing.
But that is my whole point. These
crazy people will not stop doing crimes if guns are banned. Even if guns are illegal, killers will find
ways to acquire one. In 2011 when guns
were supposedly “banned”, around 33,000 Americans died from gun-related
incidents just in that year. If killers
cannot get their hands on a gun, they will use other various weapons such as
knives and explosives. It has been
proven that something as simple as a household pen can be used as a
weapon. Therefore, the death rate would
most likely not increase or decrease depending on guns. But there is a chance that we could maybe
stop or prevent such horrific crimes if citizens were allowed to carry guns on
them.
While Obama’s plan to prevent gun
violence addresses the need for background checks on all gun purchases, it
simply would not be enough to stop a potential killer. Just from the two incidents previously
mentioned, the killers did not have a troubled background that would require
them to be denied the right to a gun. I
know that it makes me extremely uncomfortable knowing that sick people such as
these killers are walking around with guns on them. Thus, I would want to be able to protect
myself against someone like this.
My
main goal in this letter is to address the matters at hand. This includes the problem of mass shootings
taking places more frequent than not. Because
of that, I am not saying that people should be allowed to carry automatic
guns. The definition of these types of
guns states: “A firearm that
reloads itself and keeps firing until the trigger is released.” These types of guns simply are not necessary
for civilians own. The types of guns I
think should be legal are ones that are made merely for protection. For example, that includes guns such as
pistols and rifles. These guns would
enable you to defend yourself under an attack, yet they would not be out of
control and in constant fire like automatic guns. The types of guns I recommend are also the
ones that the second amendment supports.
This amendment clearly states that if needed for protection, people have
the right to bear arms. The second
amendment was written way before automatic guns were even invented. Therefore, I think there should be a law
excluding these weapons from the public.
What’s
to stop people from leading a shooting everyday with or without the prevention
of guns? Nevertheless, my point is that
we might be able to defend ourselves as well as others if citizens could carry
guns on them. While self-defense is
always a possibility if one is being attacked by a criminal, many victims would
not be able to take on and fight the attacker.
Sadly, that leaves them helpless and in danger. All my life I have grown up in an extremely
small town with a total of approximately 1,860 people. When I go to a big city or someplace I am not
comfortable, I literally have a fear of what could happen. Life is a precious thing and should not be
taken for granted. Before we know it,
our lives or the lives of a loved one could end suddenly. We need to take every precaution that we can
to save lives.
When
saying that citizens should be allowed to carry guns on them I am thinking
about the safety of our people. No
matter how hard we try, our officials cannot stop all killers and shooters from
doing what they wish. It simply can’t be
done. Guns were not originally designed
for killing. They were designed for
protection. Guns do not kill people,
people kill people. I am proposing that
citizens should be allowed to carry guns on them purely for the reason of
safety and protection.
The prevention of gun control or the promoting of gun control would not stop crime? Be careful in your wording in the first paragraph there.
ReplyDeleteHow many mass shootings have occurred in America specifically. Try and give numbers whenever you can. This adds some extra punch to your arguments.
You mention 2011 and a gun ban. To what are you referring to? I don't recall this. Be more specific.
While it is true that some people have committed terrible destruction and not shown signs of mental distress, would background checks raise the chance of keeping weapons out of the hands of potential killers?
You make some very good points about automatic weaponry being an exclusion to the rules about what should be allowed. The bit about the 2nd amendment was pretty good, too.
I think your letter will need more structure. Think of it as any persuasive writing. Establish the problem, make your claim, then support of with your facts. I think at some points your main ideas get jumbled and you jump around a bit. Make your stance clear at the start with regards to what you want to talk about: is it background checks, automatic guns, concealed carry laws, or some combination of all those things? I get that it's about concealed carry, but it isn't as straight forward at the start.
9/10